I was reading the article in the Sept/Oct issue about whether or not Facebook can replace face-to-face in education. Though I think the opinions presented are important, I find them to be far to biased to be present in the educational world. Why can we not compromise between the two? Students are indeed living in a world where face-to-face interaction must be fostered, but along with that they need to have internet presence, responsibility, and networking skills. The internet and the ability to effectively use specific sites, such as Facebook, is extremely important in today's world, both socially and in a business sense. Because of this fact, I think it is important that as educator's we address both forms of communication with our students. Both the point and counterpoint sides of this argument in the article are completely biased and are not arguing for a mix of the two. We cannot teach students to communicate merely on the internet, for they will not have the social skills necessary. But at the same time, student's who can only communicate face-to-face will have no idea what to do when assignments or jobs in the future ask them to use the internet for an interview, search tool, or networking opportunity. Essentially, both means of communication need to be addressed, and I am a bit disappointed that this face was not addressed in the article.
Tags:
-
▶ Reply to This